APQPSigma is in active development. This experience illustrates the platform we are building.
Choose Your Quality Journey
๐ญ
APQP Project
Advanced Product Quality Planning
For launching NEW products with a structured approach from concept through production.
Required for automotive PPAP submissions.
USE CASES:
New product introduction
Major design changes
New supplier qualification
Customer requires PPAP
TIMELINE:
12-24 months (full development cycle)
Not active in this prototype โ APQP project creation is part of the platform we are building.
๐ฏ
DMAIC Project
Six Sigma Process Improvement
For improving EXISTING processes using data-driven Six Sigma methodology.
Reduce defects, improve cycle time, increase yield.
USE CASES:
Reduce defect rates
Improve cycle time
Increase first pass yield
Cost reduction projects
TIMELINE:
3-6 months (improvement project)
Not active in this prototype โ DMAIC project creation is part of the platform we are building.
๐ก Why Both in One Platform?
Most quality teams need both methodologies. Use APQP to successfully launch new products,
then use DMAIC to continuously improve them once in production. One platform, one team, all your quality work.
Phase-by-Phase Comparison
๐ญ
APQP Phases
Product Launch Methodology
1
Plan & Define
Voice of customer, design goals, feasibility
2
Product Design
DFMEA, design verification, prototype
3
Process Design
PFMEA, control plan, work instructions
4
Validation
Production trial, Cpk studies, PPAP
5
Production
Launch, SPC monitoring, continuous improvement
๐ฏ
DMAIC Phases
Process Improvement Methodology
D
Define
Problem statement, goal, scope, team charter
M
Measure
Data collection, baseline, MSA, capability
A
Analyze
Root cause analysis, hypothesis testing
I
Improve
Solutions, DOE, pilot testing, validation
C
Control
Control plan, SPC, sustain improvements
The handoff
APQP establishes the product and the process for production.
Once the process is running, DMAIC begins the continuous improvement journey.
APQP · Phase 5 · ProductionAPQP gets the product into production
↓
ProductionThe production process is running
↓
DMAICDMAIC improves the process that is running
Define→Measure→Analyze→Improve→Control
๐ ๏ธ Shared Tool Library
How the quality toolset is shared across APQP and DMAIC.
Sharing a tool does not merge the two methodologies — APQP remains APQP, DMAIC remains DMAIC.
Phase-level tool mapping is being defined as part of the APQPSigma methodology model.
๐ฌ Live Project View
๐ฏ DMAIC Project: Reduce Cycle Time by 30%
D
Define
M
Measure
A
Analyze
I
Improve
C
Control
๐ Analyze Phase Tasks (3/5 complete)
โ Collect process data
โ Perform capability analysis (Cpk = 0.87)
โ Run hypothesis testing (p < 0.001)
โฌ Identify root causes (use Fishbone)
โฌ Validate findings with DOE
๐ก AI Recommendation: Your Cpk is below target (0.87). Consider running a Fishbone diagram session, then use DOE in the Improve phase to find optimal settings.
๐ญ APQP Project: New Brake Caliper for Ford F-150
1
Plan
2
Design
3
Process
4
Validate
5
Production
๐ Process Design Tasks (5/8 complete)
โ Complete PFMEA
โ Create process flow diagram
โ Develop control plan
โ Write work instructions
โ Plan MSA studies
โฌ Equipment procurement
โฌ Packaging design
โฌ Management support
๐ก Next Milestone: Complete Phase 3 to move to validation. Estimated: 2 weeks. Then prepare for production trial and PPAP submission.